File:Edwards Article 1-figure 2.PNG
Size of this preview: 800 × 504 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 201 pixels | 910 × 573 pixels.
Original file (910 × 573 pixels, file size: 241 KB, MIME type: image/png)
Figure 2. Comparison of the longitudinal redox zonation concept (A) and the plume fringe concept (B). Both concepts describe the spatial distribution of electron acceptors and respiration processes in a hydrocarbon contaminant plume. (B) Iron(III) reduction, manganese(IV) reduction, and methanogenesis may occur simultaneously in the core of the contaminant plume (from Rainer, et al., 2015; reproduced with permission from EST)
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 16:15, 25 January 2017 | 910 × 573 (241 KB) | Debra Tabron (talk | contribs) | Figure 2. Comparison of the longitudinal redox zonation concept (A) and the plume fringe concept (B). Both concepts describe the spatial distribution of electron acceptors and respiration processes in a hydrocarbon contaminant plume. (B) Iron(III) redu... |
- You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following page links to this file: