Difference between revisions of "User:Debra Tabron/sandbox"

From Enviro Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
!style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| REGULATORY AGENCY!!style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"|  DESCRIPTION !!style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"|  PFOS!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| PFOA!!style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"|  PFBS!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| PFBA!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| PFNA
+
!style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| Energetic!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"|  Aqueous Solubility!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"|  Formula!! style="background-color:#CEE0F2;"| Reference
 
|-
 
|-
| colspan="12" style="color:black;text-align:center;"|'''DRINKING WATER (µG/L)'''
+
| TNT|| 100|| C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>5</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O<sub>6</sub>|| Ro et al., 1996<ref>Ro, K.S., Venugopal, A., Adrian, D.D., Constant, D., Qaisi, K., Valsaraj, K.T., Thibodeaux, L.J. and Roy, D., 1996. Solubility of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) in water. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 41(4), pp.758-761. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je950322w doi: 10.1021/je950322w]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
| U.S. EPA || [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/e/e9/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2_L1-Drinking_water_health_advisories.pdf Drinking Water Health Advisories] ||style="text-align:center;"|0.07||style="text-align:center;"|0.07 || || ||
+
| RDX|| 60|| C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>6</sub>N<sub>6</sub>O<sub>6</sub>|| Banerjee et al., 1980<ref>Banerjee, S., Yalkowsky, S.H. and Valvani, C., 1980. Water solubility and octanol/water partition coefficients of organics. Limitations of the solubility-partition coefficient correlation. Environmental Science & Technology, 14(10), pp.1227-1229. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es60170a013 doi: 10.1021/es60170a013]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|Health Canada|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/d/de/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L2-Drinking_water_screening_values.pdf Drinking Water Screening Values]||style="text-align:center;"| 0.6||style="text-align:center;"| 0.2||style="text-align:center;"| 15||style="text-align:center;"| 30||style="text-align:center;"| 0.2
+
| HMX|| 4.6|| C<sub>4</sub>H<sub>8</sub>N<sub>8</sub>O<sub>8</sub>|| Monteil-Rivera et al., 2004<ref>Monteil-Rivera, F., Paquet, L., Deschamps, S., Balakrishnan, V.K., Beaulieu, C. and Hawari, J., 2004. Physico-chemical measurements of CL-20 for environmental applications: Comparison with RDX and HMX. Journal of Chromatography A, 1025(1), pp.125-132. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.060 doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.060]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|Main Department of Environmental Protection|| Maximum Exposure Guideline|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.1 || || ||
+
| 2,4-DNT|| 280|| C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>6</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>|| Rosenblatt et al., 1991<ref>Rosenblatt, D.H., Burrows, E.P., Mitchell, W.R. and Parmer, D.L., 1991. Organic explosives and related compounds. In Anthropogenic Compounds (pp. 195-234). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46757-1_4 doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46757-1_4]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
| Michigan Department of Environmental Quality|| Drinking Water Surface Water Quality Value ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.011||style="text-align:center;"| 0.42|| || ||
+
| NG|| 1500 @ 20°C|| C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O<sub>9</sub>|| Yinon, 1999<ref>Yinon, J., 1999. Forensic and environmental detection of explosives. John Wiley & Sons. [http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471983713.html ISBN: 978-0-471-98371-2]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection || Preliminary Health-Based Guidance Value|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.04 || || ||
+
| NQ|| 2600±100|| CH<sub>4</sub>N<sub>4</sub>O<sub>2</sub>|| Haag et al., 1990<ref>Haag, W.R., Spanggord, R., Mill, T., Podoll, R.T., Chou, T.W., Tse, D.S. and Harper, J.C., 1990. Aquatic environmental fate of nitroguanidine.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 9(11), pp.1359-1367. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620091105 doi:10.1002/etc.5620091105]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ||[http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/5/55/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L6-Dev_of_MCL_recommendations_for_PFOA_and_PFOS.pdf Development of MCL Recommendations for PFOA and PFOS are Currently in Progress]|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.04|| || ||
+
| DNAN|| 276; 213|| C<sub>7</sub>H<sub>6</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>|| Boddu et al., 2008<ref>Boddu, V.M., Abburi, K., Maloney, S.W. and Damavarapu, R., 2008. Thermophysical properties of an insensitive munitions compound, 2, 4-dinitroanisole. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 53(5), pp.1120-1125. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je7006764 doi: 10.1021/je7006764]</ref>; Hawari et al., 2015<ref>Hawari, J., Monteil-Rivera, F., Perreault, N.N., Halasz, A., Paquet, L., Radovic-Hrapovic, Z., Deschamps, S., Thiboutot, S. and Ampleman, G., 2015. Environmental fate of 2, 4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) and its reduced products. Chemosphere, 119, pp.16-23. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.047 doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.047]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/a/af/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L7-Health-Based_Maximum_Contaminant_Level_MCL.pdf Health-Based Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) Recommendation]|| || || || ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.013
+
| NTO|| 16642|| C<sub>2</sub>N<sub>4</sub>O<sub>3</sub>|| Spear et al., 1989<ref>Spear, R.J., Louey, C.N. and Wolfson, M.G., 1989. A preliminary assessment of 3-nitro-1, 2, 4-triazol-5-one (NTO) as an insensitive high explosive (No. MRL-TR-89-18). Materials Research Labs (Australia). [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/f/fe/Spear-1989-Prelim_Assessment_of_NTO.pdf Report pdf]</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
|Vermont Department of Health|| [http://dec.vermont.gov/ Drinking Water Health Advisory Level]|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.02|| || ||
+
| AP|| 217000|| NH<sub>4</sub>ClO<sub>4</sub>|| Motzer 2001<ref>Motzer, W.E., 2001. Perchlorate: problems, detection, and solutions. Environmental Forensics, 2(4), pp.301-311. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enfo.2001.0059 doi:10.1006/enfo.2001.0059]</ref>
|-
 
| colspan="12" style="color:black;text-align:center;"|'''GROUNDWATER (µG/L)'''
 
|-
 
|Minnesota Department of Health|| Health Risk Limit for Groundwater ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.3||style="text-align:center;"| 0.3 ||style="text-align:center;"| 7 ||style="text-align:center;"| 7 ||
 
|-
 
|Illinois Environmental Protection Agency|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/3/3a/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L10-Provisional_Groundwater_Remediaton_Objectives_Class_I_Groundwater.pdf Provisional Groundwater Remediation Objectives, Class I Groundwater]||style="text-align:center;"| 0.2||style="text-align:center;"| 0.4|| || ||
 
|-
 
|Illinois Environmental Protection Agency|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/0/00/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L11-Provisional_Groundwater_Remediaton_Objectives_Class_II_Groundwater_.pdf Provisional Groundwater Remediation Objectives, Class II Groundwater]|| style="text-align:center;"|0.2|| style="text-align:center;"|0.2|| || ||
 
|-
 
|North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality||[http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/air-quality/science-advisory-board-toxic-air-pollutants/ncsab-aal-recommendations Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration] || || style="text-align:center;"|1.0|| || ||
 
|-
 
|New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/2/2c/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L13-Interim_specific_groundwatr_quality_criterion_fact_sheet.pdf Interim Specific Ground Water Quality Criterion]|| || || || ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.01
 
|-
 
|Maine Department of Environmental Protection|| Remedial Action Guidelines for Residential Groundwater ||style="text-align:center;"| 0.06||style="text-align:center;"| 0.1|| || ||
 
|-
 
|Michigan Department of Environmental Quality|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/a/a8/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L15-Groundwater_residential_generic_cleanup_criteria_and_screening_levels_.pdf Groundwater Residential Generic Cleanup Criteria and Screening Levels]|| style="text-align:center;"|0.12||style="text-align:center;"| 0.089|| || ||
 
|-
 
| Michigan Department of Environmental Quality|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/9/97/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L16-Groundwater_nonresidential_generic_cleanup_criteria_and_screening_levels.pdf Groundwater Nonresidential Generic Cleanup Criteria and Screening Levels]|| style="text-align:center;"|0.5||style="text-align:center;"| 0.28 || || ||
 
|-
 
|Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Risk Reduction Program|| Protective Concentration Levels for 16 PFASs for Several Different Exposure Scenarios|| || || || ||
 
|-
 
| colspan="12" style="color:black;text-align:center;"|'''SOIL (MG/KG)'''
 
|-
 
| U.S. EPA Region 4|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/e/e9/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L18-Residential_soil_screening_levels.pdf Residential Soil Screening Level]|| style="text-align:center;"|6|| style="text-align:center;"|16|| || ||
 
|-
 
|Minnesota Pollution Control Agency|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/3/36/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L19-Industrial_soil_reference_value.xlsx Industrial Soil Reference Value (.xlsx)]||style="text-align:center;"| 14||style="text-align:center;"| 13|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 500||
 
|-
 
|Minnesota Pollution Control Agency|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/8/84/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L20-Residential_soil_reference_value.xlsx Residential Soil Reference Value(.xlsx)]||style="text-align:center;"| 2.1|| style="text-align:center;"|2.1|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 77||
 
|-
 
|Minnesota Pollution Control Agency|| [http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/0/06/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L21-Recreational_soil_reference_value.xlsx Recreational Soil Reference Value(.xlsx)]|| style="text-align:center;"|2.6||style="text-align:center;"| 2.5|| ||style="text-align:center;"| 95||
 
|-
 
|Maine Department of Environmental Protection||[http://www.environmentalrestoration.wiki/images/1/1f/Deeb-Article_1-Table_2-L22-ME-Remedial_Action_guidelines.pdf Remedial Action Guidelines for different exposure scenarios]||style="text-align:center;"|11-82|| || || ||
 
|-
 
|Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Risk Reduction Program ||Protective Concentration Levels for 16 PFASs for Several Different Exposure Scenarios || || || || ||
 
 
|}
 
|}
Table 2. Summary of PFAS Regulatory Criteria
 
 
Regulatory criteria for PFAS are still evolving relatively quickly. Please check the hyperlinked reference to confirm that the regulatory criteria listed in the table are up to date before using this information. Some states have PFAS regulatory values for groundwater as a result of consent agreements (e.g., both West Virginia and Ohio signed a consent agreement with DuPont listing 0.4 µg/L as a precautionary site-specific action level for PFOA). Other states (e.g., Delaware, New Hampshire, New York) have adopted U.S. EPA provisional health advisory levels for PFOS and PFOA in several water systems. Pennsylvania has investigated PFOS contamination associated with two contaminated wells identified through EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule program. Alabama has also addressed PFAS contamination on a site-specific basis. Alaska has conducted sampling and monitoring for PFAS at multiple sites.
 

Revision as of 19:43, 19 October 2016

Energetic Aqueous Solubility Formula Reference
TNT 100 C7H5N3O6 Ro et al., 1996[1]
RDX 60 C3H6N6O6 Banerjee et al., 1980[2]
HMX 4.6 C4H8N8O8 Monteil-Rivera et al., 2004[3]
2,4-DNT 280 C7H6N2O4 Rosenblatt et al., 1991[4]
NG 1500 @ 20°C C3H5N3O9 Yinon, 1999[5]
NQ 2600±100 CH4N4O2 Haag et al., 1990[6]
DNAN 276; 213 C7H6N2O5 Boddu et al., 2008[7]; Hawari et al., 2015[8]
NTO 16642 C2N4O3 Spear et al., 1989[9]
AP 217000 NH4ClO4 Motzer 2001[10]
  1. ^ Ro, K.S., Venugopal, A., Adrian, D.D., Constant, D., Qaisi, K., Valsaraj, K.T., Thibodeaux, L.J. and Roy, D., 1996. Solubility of 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) in water. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 41(4), pp.758-761. doi: 10.1021/je950322w
  2. ^ Banerjee, S., Yalkowsky, S.H. and Valvani, C., 1980. Water solubility and octanol/water partition coefficients of organics. Limitations of the solubility-partition coefficient correlation. Environmental Science & Technology, 14(10), pp.1227-1229. doi: 10.1021/es60170a013
  3. ^ Monteil-Rivera, F., Paquet, L., Deschamps, S., Balakrishnan, V.K., Beaulieu, C. and Hawari, J., 2004. Physico-chemical measurements of CL-20 for environmental applications: Comparison with RDX and HMX. Journal of Chromatography A, 1025(1), pp.125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.08.060
  4. ^ Rosenblatt, D.H., Burrows, E.P., Mitchell, W.R. and Parmer, D.L., 1991. Organic explosives and related compounds. In Anthropogenic Compounds (pp. 195-234). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46757-1_4
  5. ^ Yinon, J., 1999. Forensic and environmental detection of explosives. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-98371-2
  6. ^ Haag, W.R., Spanggord, R., Mill, T., Podoll, R.T., Chou, T.W., Tse, D.S. and Harper, J.C., 1990. Aquatic environmental fate of nitroguanidine.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 9(11), pp.1359-1367. doi:10.1002/etc.5620091105
  7. ^ Boddu, V.M., Abburi, K., Maloney, S.W. and Damavarapu, R., 2008. Thermophysical properties of an insensitive munitions compound, 2, 4-dinitroanisole. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 53(5), pp.1120-1125. doi: 10.1021/je7006764
  8. ^ Hawari, J., Monteil-Rivera, F., Perreault, N.N., Halasz, A., Paquet, L., Radovic-Hrapovic, Z., Deschamps, S., Thiboutot, S. and Ampleman, G., 2015. Environmental fate of 2, 4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) and its reduced products. Chemosphere, 119, pp.16-23. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.047
  9. ^ Spear, R.J., Louey, C.N. and Wolfson, M.G., 1989. A preliminary assessment of 3-nitro-1, 2, 4-triazol-5-one (NTO) as an insensitive high explosive (No. MRL-TR-89-18). Materials Research Labs (Australia). Report pdf
  10. ^ Motzer, W.E., 2001. Perchlorate: problems, detection, and solutions. Environmental Forensics, 2(4), pp.301-311. doi:10.1006/enfo.2001.0059